Bigger Better Tennis - Paul Dale

                                                                   Nothing is more satisfying than beating an opponent who is, on paper, at least better than you.   A win against a superior opponent sets you apart as a genuine competitor. Beating superior opponents set you apart from the other players. Here are three ways to overcome a stronger opponent. 1.  Do Your Homework First Playing someone supposedly better than you suggests that your opponent is technically, physically, OR mentally stronger than you. They could even be technically, physically, AND mentally stronger than you! Don’t panic. It's time to plan their demise. Begin by l ooking at what they do best. Ask the following questions: Speed: do they prefer the ball fast or slow? Direction: do they like the ball wide or tight into the body? Height: do they like the ball high or low? Position: Do they want to play at the net or baseline? That’s the technical part finished. Your job is to give them the opposite of the

Men's Singles 4th Round Oredictions: Tsonga bt Wawrinka , Del Potro bt Berdych , Ferrer bt Granollers , Gasquet bt Murray , Almegro bt Tipsarevic , Nadal bt Monaco

Men's Singles French Open predictions (third Round): David Ferrer bt Mikhail Youzhny , Granollers bt Mathieu , Gasquet bt Haas , Murray bt Giraldo , Tipsarevic bt Benneteau , Almagro bt Mayer, Raonic bt Monaco , Nadal bt Schwank. 4th Round predictions: Djokovic bt Seppi , Tsonga bt Wawrinka , Federer bt Goffin , Del Potro bt Berdych

With the 2012 French Open about to start here are my predictions for the men up until the third Round: Djokovic v Melzer, Davydenko v Verdasco, Simon v Wawrinka, Fognini v Tsonga, Federer v Mahut, Stephanek v Lopez, Del Potro v Ferrero, Anderson v Berdych, Ferrer v Haase, Granollers v Isner, Haas v Gasquet, Falla v Murray, Tipsarevic v Benneteau, Kolhschreiber v Almegro, Monaco v Raonic, Karlovic v Nadal.

 Traveling with players to different countries can be challenging and rewarding As coaches we sometimes forget that the essence of our job is to help players win in competition.   We spend a lot of time on   the practice court but a large portion of our job should involve being with our players at tournaments and helping them translate work on the practice court into results at tournaments. It would be nice if that happened automatically but unfortunately it doesn’t always translate on the match court. It’s difficult during practice however to simulate match-play conditions and to teach a player to create and implement a strategy during the heat of battle.   I have always found that the tournament environment   actually enhances the learning   process because the player is much more receptive to advice.   The player is under pressure and will listen to key instructions on technique and strategy.    Here is a check-list of suggestions for coaches traveling with play

With the French Open just around the corner this year the men’s singles looks tough to pick.   Here is a summary of 10 players likely to feature at the business end of the tournament. Djokovic goes into the French Open 2012 as favourite Novak Djokovic: prospects 8 ½ /10 Winning is a habit and Djokovic has had a really messy lead-up to Roland Garros this year. He still has the strongest game amongst the men and the grit to win multiple victories against the top prospect listed here. Djokovic is the hot favourite this year and has a mental advantage over the other top players.  No one goes into a match with Djokovic confident of victory, h owever any loss effects a players confidence no matter what the reasons for the loss.  Federer is in form but can he get past Nadal Roger Federer: prospects 7 ½ /10 Federer has done really well to keep up the pressure on Djokovic and Nadal.   The fire still burns inside and he knows how to win at Roland Garros.   He’s had

I attended a high performance sport seminar once and one of the speakers asked all the participants how important the mind was in their sport.   He asked what percentage the mind played in their sport compared to technique, fitness, nutrition etc. The representatives from all the various sports estimated the importance of the mind and the answers varied, but not by much.   Everyone estimated the percentage to be between 75-90%. They all thought the mind was the most important aspect. The speakers’ next question was even more reveling.   He asked “what percentage of practice time do you devote to training the mental aspects in your sport”? The answers fell between 10-15%! Why is it that as coaches we devote so little of our time to something that we know to be so important to the outcome in our various competitions?   I think the reason is that we understand very little about the way the mind works and therefore it’s difficult to train.   It’s the “hard” subject we try